Ryzen 5900X or 3900X? Worth upgrading?
|AMD’s new Ryzen CPUs seem to be a smash hit. If you can find one, much like all launches in 2020 that can be difficult, they are crushing Intel even in gaming, and powering through their last gen counterparts too – but how good are they? If you have a 3900X, is it actually worth upgrading to a 5900X? Or if you are building from scratch is the new 5th gen chip worth the extra cash? Lets test them and find out.
We’ve all seen AMD’s slides, 19% IPC improvement, faster in 1080p gaming than a 10900K, and a good performance uplift across the board elsewhere. But that’s press materials, not the real world, so how does it hold up? Really well. We will go into detail in a second, but to give you the headlines, you get 20% more single threaded performance, 15% more multithreaded, and up to 20% more FPS in games at 1080p. It’s amazing. But I picked my wording carefully there.I said “up to 20% more FPS”, because in the games I tested, it ranged from within margin of error, to 5%, 10% and 22% more performance, so it really does vary.
A quick note about my testing setup, since I don’t have a 3080 or 3090, and the 3070 I do currently have is the non-OC one from ZOTAC, I’m using the same 2080ti I’ve used for the last year or two for benchmarks. That means while I can’t publish my old results as comparisons, I can use them to roughly gauge how it fairs. I’m using the latest BIOS version available for the B550 Steel Legend motherboard, 1.52, 3600MHz CL16 RAM, and the latest 457.30 driver from NVIDIA. Sorted? Great, lets look at the numbers.
COD MW | 5900X | 3900X |
1080p AVG | 175.98 | 171.02 |
1% Low | 140.4494382 | 138.5041551 |
1% Low ms | 7.12 | 7.22 |
1440p AVG | 132.87 | 131.62 |
1% Low | 107.4113856 | 110.619469 |
1% Low ms | 9.31 | 9.04 |
4K AVG | 80.9 | 80.38 |
1% Low | 66.62225183 | 68.58710562 |
1% Low ms | 15.01 | 14.58 |
BFV | 5900X | 3900X |
1080p AVG | 172.74 | 155.2 |
1% Low | 150.3759398 | 128.7001287 |
1% Low ms | 6.65 | 7.77 |
1440p AVG | 135.19 | 132.46 |
1% Low | 114.1552511 | 113.3786848 |
1% Low ms | 8.76 | 8.82 |
4K AVG | 81.17 | 82.52 |
1% Low | 68.63417982 | 72.93946025 |
1% Low ms | 14.57 | 13.71 |
FORTNITE | 5900X | 3900X |
1080p AVG | 208.16 | 171.2 |
1% Low | 131.5789474 | 103.626943 |
1% Low ms | 7.6 | 9.65 |
1440p AVG | 141.94 | 120.59 |
1% Low | 101.2145749 | 82.3723229 |
1% Low ms | 9.88 | 12.14 |
4K AVG | 73.37 | 62.77 |
1% Low | 57.7700751 | 47.82400765 |
1% Low ms | 17.31 | 20.91 |
Watchdogs Legion | 5900X | 3900X |
1080p AVG | 87 | 83 |
1% Low | 68 | 62 |
1440p AVG | 69 | 69 |
1% Low | 57 | 57 |
4K AVG | 44 | 44 |
1% Low | 37 | 37 |
As for productivity, it’s a much, much clearer victory. Across the board, it’s 15 to 20% faster both in single and multithreaded tasks, although in more “real” workloads like Blender and Premiere Pro don’t always have quite as astonishing a lead.
5900X | 3900X | |
Premiere Pro (s) | 313 | 349 |
Blender BMW (s) | 113 | 119 |
Gooseberry (s) | 565 | 680 |
Cinebench R20 1T | 625 | 516 |
Cinebench R20 nT | 8063 | 7020 |
Cinebench R23 1T | 1603 | 1317 |
Cinebench R23 nT | 20769 | 17893 |
So by all accounts, the 5900X is a better CPU but there’s a catch. It costs £560 here in the UK, which is nearly £200 more than the 3900X, or over £100 more than it’s slightly faster counterpart, the 3900XT, and if I’m honest, I’m not sure it’s worth that price difference. Especially compared to the 3900X, an extra £200 is the difference between a 3070 and a 3080, which is a much more surefire way to get much, much more performance in games.
For around £50 more you can buy a brand new 3950X instead, netting you 4 more cores and a pretty similar gaming experience, although not quite as fast, but if you are buying these kind of CPUs over the 6 and 8 core variants, I would assume you are doing some sort of productivity work alongside gaming, making the extra cores count for a lot more than a couple FPS in games.
If you’ve already got a 3900X, you don’t need to upgrade. This is a brilliant chip, but the performance gap likely isn’t enough to make you want to upgrade to this, over a 3950X instead. Since the AM4 platform is end-of-life as of these chips coming out, you can always hold out for a while and pick one up when prices drop later. If you are building a new system and have to choose between the two, at current pricing the 5900X is a little hard to recommend. It does have a convincing lead over the 3900X, but the price gap is a little hard to ignore.